talios commented on PR #1190: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1190#issuecomment-1612363169
> @talios @hboutemy also, what is the problem with adding new scope (that is special,in very same way as existing "import" scope is special)? No real problem - more questioning the naming (which may be too early in the change to quibble over naming), tho reading the reasoning of 'plugins don't have scope' that means this is possibly more a trade-off due to current limitations of the POM format. @rmannibucau's comment: > Think extensions are a nice way to configure plugins makes me think back to the current tiles implementation which operates as an extension, hooking into the model builder - but with the immutable model in M4 doesn't work - an new extension point for model manipulation would be nice. One nice thing with tiles, by pulling as parents - we also pull in any `<properties/> defined, which can also then be overridden/customised. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
