michael-o commented on PR #199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/199#issuecomment-1262576217
> > * Since the `LocalPathComposer` is used throughout the docs of the
sources should mention that this substructure is also reflected in `.checksums/`
>
> The javadoc of sparse source says:
>
> ```
> * Sparse file {@link FileTrustedChecksumsSourceSupport} implementation
that use specified directory as base
> * directory, where it expects artifacts checksums on standard Maven2
"local" layout. This implementation uses Artifact
> * coordinates solely to form path from basedir, pretty much as Maven
local repository does.
> ```
I don't see how this answers my question... ?!!
> > * As for the file-compact. I like the idea. Does it make sense to reuse
rather a well-known format like BSD checksum file? See also
[nicoulaj/checksum-maven-plugin#127](https://github.com/nicoulaj/checksum-maven-plugin/issues/127)
>
> IMHO no, as BSD checksum file contains filename, here, we operate with
ArtifactId ("file format is artifact ID and checksum separated by space per
line"), see
https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/blob/master/maven-resolver-util/src/main/java/org/eclipse/aether/util/artifact/ArtifactIdUtils.java#L45
hm...we basically use our current format, but compile multiple files and key
them by artifact id. Agree.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
