[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17183689#comment-17183689
]
Hudson commented on MJAVADOC-658:
---------------------------------
Build succeeded in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven-javadoc-plugin » master
#16
See
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-javadoc-plugin/job/master/16/
> The fix operation wrongly delete generic functions's generic-class javadoc if
> exist, and add it if lack, and will not create it if param part of javadoc be
> empty
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MJAVADOC-658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-658
> Project: Maven Javadoc Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fix
> Reporter: Jin Xu
> Priority: Major
>
> fixed in https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/55
> original function:
> {code:java}
> public <T extends Object> void testGeneric(Class<T> tClass, Object o) {
> return;
> }
> {code}
> after running "fix", we get:
> {code:java}
> /**
> * <p>testGeneric.</p>
> *
> * @param tClass a {@link java.lang.Class} object.
> * @param o a {@link java.lang.Object} object.
> * @param <T> a T object.
> */
> public <T extends Object> void testGeneric(Class<T> tClass, Object o) {
> return;
> }
> {code}
> after running "fix" another time, we get:
> {code:java}
> /**
> * <p>testGeneric.</p>
> *
> * @param tClass a {@link java.lang.Class} object.
> * @param o a {@link java.lang.Object} object.
> */
> public <T extends Object> void testGeneric(Class<T> tClass, Object o) {
> return;
> }
> {code}
> after running "fix" the third time, we get:
> {code:java}
> /**
> * <p>testGeneric.</p>
> *
> * @param tClass a {@link java.lang.Class} object.
> * @param o a {@link java.lang.Object} object.
> * @param <T> a T object.
> */
> public <T extends Object> void testGeneric(Class<T> tClass, Object o) {
> return;
> }
> {code}
> again.
> and if we run fix for another time, it will continue the loop.
> so do we really need {code:java}@param <T> a T object.{code}?
> If not, then it is wrongly added.
> If so, then it is wrongly deleted.
> Be a bug either way.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
