[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16965330#comment-16965330
]
Enrico Olivelli commented on MNG-6771:
--------------------------------------
CDI API is from
[http://www.seamframework.org/Weld/cdi-api]
But now the site moved to
[http://weld.cdi-spec.org/]
It links Apache 2 License with a wrong link that it is a page in ASF website
[http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0]
the correct link should be [http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt]
but If I was them I would link to a copy of such file on their own website
> Fix license issues on binary distribution
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-6771
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6771
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: General
> Affects Versions: 3.6.2
> Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
> Assignee: Enrico Olivelli
> Priority: Major
> Labels: licenses
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Please feel free to adjust the priority, however
> [http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#licensing] says that license
> clearance is a must, thus I report this as a Blocker.
> {quote}Every ASF release MUST comply with ASF licensing policy. This
> requirement is of utmost importance
> {quote}
> I downloaded apache-maven-3.6.2-bin.zip, and I see the following issues with
> it (note: there might be more):
> h2. 1) jcl-over-slf4j:1.7.25
> in apache-maven-3.6.2/LICENSE:
> {quote} - JCL 1.2 implemented over SLF4J
> ([http://www.slf4j.org|http://www.slf4j.org/])
> org.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j:jar:1.7.25
> License: MIT License (MIT)
> [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php]
> (lib/jcl-over-slf4j.license){quote}
> The license for the artifact is most likely Apache 2.0 rather than MIT:
> [https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/tree/master/jcl-over-slf4j]
> h2. 2) slf4j-api:1.7.25
> in apache-maven-3.6.2/LICENSE:
> {quote} - SLF4J API Module ([http://www.slf4j.org|http://www.slf4j.org/])
> org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.7.25
> License: MIT License (MIT)
> [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php]
> (lib/slf4j-api.license){quote}
> Maven does not comply with SLF4j license.
> Here's license for SLF4j: [https://www.slf4j.org/license.html]
> It requires to include slf4j copyright notice, however, Maven fails to do
> that
> h2. 3) MIT license
> [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php] must not be used as it
> almost never points to a true license. It is extremely unlucky that someone
> would copyright their work as "Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>"
> h2. 4) org.eclipse.sisu.inject:0.3.3
> in apache-maven-3.6.2/LICENSE:
> {quote} - org.eclipse.sisu.inject
> ([http://www.eclipse.org/sisu/org.eclipse.sisu.inject/])
> org.eclipse.sisu:org.eclipse.sisu.inject:eclipse-plugin:0.3.3
> License: Eclipse Public License, Version 1.0 (EPL-1.0)
> [http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html]
> (lib/org.eclipse.sisu.inject.license){quote}
> The link to eclipse.org/sisu responds with 404.
> sisu might have their own copyright notices that should be retained, however
> Maven re-distributes none of them (org.eclipse.sisu.inject.site-0.3.3.zip has
> notice.html file which is not present in Maven re-distribution)
> h2. 5) ASM in org.eclipse.sisu.inject-0.3.3.jar
> lib/org.eclipse.sisu.inject-0.3.3.jar bundles ASM. ASM is MIT licensed, thus
> every re-distribution MUST retain ASM copyright notice.
> Maven re-distributes ASM and fails to comply with ASM license.
> h2. 6) jsoup in wagon-http-3.3.3-shaded.jar
> lib/wagon-http-3.3.3-shaded.jar bundles jsoup ([https://jsoup.org/license])
> which is MIT-licensed. Maven fails to comply with jsoup license.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
