[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16277145#comment-16277145
 ] 

Andrei Pozolotin commented on MPLUGIN-247:
------------------------------------------

There are multitude of ways, from writing custom extractor with scala-meta to 
adding annotation/description.
The annotation/description approach seems minimal-effort to me. Plus, it will 
work in "any other java" context.
Am I wrong? What would you recommend? Will you accept a patch for 
annotation/description support in java-extractor?

> Allow getting mojo/parameter description/since/deprecated from annotations
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MPLUGIN-247
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-247
>             Project: Maven Plugin Tools
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: maven-plugin-annotations
>    Affects Versions: 3.2
>            Reporter: Alex Hvostov
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: extra-annotations.diff
>
>
> The attached patch adds annotations {{@Description}}, {{@Since}}, and 
> {{@DeprecatedBecause}}, which can be used instead of Javadoc comments for 
> describing a Mojo and its parameters.
> My use-case for this feature is writing Maven plugins in Scala. This language 
> supports annotations, but a Java parser will obviously not be able to extract 
> description/since/deprecated information from Scala source files. (There is 
> another {{plugin-tools}} implementation specifically for writing Scala 
> plugins, which has its own set of annotations, but it is buggy, incomplete, 
> and not under active development.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to