[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=364910#comment-364910
 ] 

David M. Lloyd commented on MCOMPILER-203:
------------------------------------------

Also if no {{<processorArguments>}} are given, then the default argument 
mechanism (inheriting from javac) should be used.  If it is given though, then 
a simple wrapping Processor would be used which provides the given arguments to 
the delegate.

> Allow compiler-plugin to specify annotation processor dependencies
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MCOMPILER-203
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-203
>             Project: Maven Compiler Plugin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.2, 3.1
>         Environment: Java 6+
>            Reporter: David M. Lloyd
>
> Right now the status quo for annotation processor artifacts requires one of 
> two actions:
> # Use an external plugin for annotation processing
> # Put the annotation processor in as a dependency with {{provided}} scope
> The former is suboptimal because the external plugins are clunky and 
> ill-supported, and inflexible/hard to use.  The latter is suboptimal because 
> it is often the case that you do not want to leak annotation processor 
> classes on to the application class path.
> It should be possible to add annotation processor dependency artifacts to the 
> compiler plugin configuration such that they are recognized by the annotation 
> processing search algorithm of the compiler, but they do not actually appear 
> on the compilation class path.  Ideally they would also be isolated from one 
> another (dependency graphs and all), but that's more of a "nice to have".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)

Reply via email to