[ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=364910#comment-364910 ]
David M. Lloyd commented on MCOMPILER-203: ------------------------------------------ Also if no {{<processorArguments>}} are given, then the default argument mechanism (inheriting from javac) should be used. If it is given though, then a simple wrapping Processor would be used which provides the given arguments to the delegate. > Allow compiler-plugin to specify annotation processor dependencies > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: MCOMPILER-203 > URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-203 > Project: Maven Compiler Plugin > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 2.3.2, 3.1 > Environment: Java 6+ > Reporter: David M. Lloyd > > Right now the status quo for annotation processor artifacts requires one of > two actions: > # Use an external plugin for annotation processing > # Put the annotation processor in as a dependency with {{provided}} scope > The former is suboptimal because the external plugins are clunky and > ill-supported, and inflexible/hard to use. The latter is suboptimal because > it is often the case that you do not want to leak annotation processor > classes on to the application class path. > It should be possible to add annotation processor dependency artifacts to the > compiler plugin configuration such that they are recognized by the annotation > processing search algorithm of the compiler, but they do not actually appear > on the compilation class path. Ideally they would also be isolated from one > another (dependency graphs and all), but that's more of a "nice to have". -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.6#6162)