[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-127?page=all ]

Fabrice BELLINGARD closed MSUREFIRE-127.
----------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.3

> when fork is enabled, Surefire should use the same JVM running Maven (i.e. 
> use java.home sysprop), rather than expecting java to be in the system PATH
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MSUREFIRE-127
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-127
>             Project: Maven 2.x Surefire Plugin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>            Reporter: Ian Springer
>         Assigned To: Fabrice BELLINGARD
>             Fix For: 2.3
>
>
> Here's the thread from maven-users:
> +1
> (Haven't been bitten by this yet, but it is certainly not intuitive.)
> On 6/1/06, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Springer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 2:36 PM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: RE: forking surefire VM
> >
> > I think the default should be the same JVM that launched Maven (i.e.
> > System.getProperty("java.home") + File.pathSeparator + "bin" + 
> > File.pathSeparator + "java"). This seems more intuitive.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> > Carlos Sanchez
> > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 3:20 PM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: Re: forking surefire VM
> >
> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html
> >
> > jvm: Option to specify the jvm (or path to the java executable) to use 
> > with the forking options. For the default we will assume that java is 
> > in the path.
> >
> >
> > On 6/1/06, Ruel Loehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've seen this as well.   There is an option for setting which vm to
> > use, I had to use it work around the problem.   Maybe you could open a
> > jira issue for it.
> > >
> > > Ruel Loehr
> > > JBoss QA

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to