[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-134?page=comments#action_68285 ]
Paul Russell commented on MSUREFIRE-134: ---------------------------------------- Chaps, to clarify, my comment above is incorrect. The workaround 'works' for me because I happen to be following JUnit style naming conventions despite my use of NG. This is a pretty critical bug imho, and would benefit from your full attention. Don't want you to be labouring under the misapprehension that my workaround above is solving the problem. The inevitable question: and ETA for a patch for this? > Surefire finds test classes but ignores test methods and configuration > methods with TestNG and includes tag > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MSUREFIRE-134 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-134 > Project: Maven 2.x Surefire Plugin > Type: Bug > Versions: 2.2 > Environment: Maven 2.0.4 > Surefire Plugin 2.2 > TestNG 4.7 jdk15 (using annotations) > Sun JDK 1.5_06 > Windows XP SP 2 > Reporter: Mark Reynolds > Attachments: maven2-testng.zip > > > Attachment contains 2 projects which are identical except for how the test > cases are referenced. In one project they are referenced via a suite xml > file. In the second they are referenced using the includes tag. I believe > they should produce identical results. > Both projects find all 6 test classes, but only the one using a suite xml > file actually executes the configuration methods and test methods. The > project using an includes tag completely ignores the configuratiion methods > and test methods. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
