jainankitk commented on issue #13084: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13084#issuecomment-3504819293
> So in my benchamrks I will first introduce the deletion pattern dimension to evaluate the impact of clustered versus non-clustered deleted documents on iteration. Does this make sense? Having _deletion pattern_ dimension to evaluate the impact of clustered versus non-clustered deleted documents makes sense to me. Though, I am still trying to reason how that information feeds into coming up with the right deletion rate threshold for `SparseFixedBitSet`? Or maybe the deletion rate and clustering information is better captured using the memory overhead ratio of `SparseFixedBitSet` and `FixedBitSet`. The size of `SparseFixedBitSet` should be directly proportional to the `# deleted documents`, and inversely proportional to the amount of clustered deletions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
