uschindler commented on issue #15068: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/15068#issuecomment-3212211734
> Hi [@uschindler](https://github.com/uschindler), The fix makes sense and should solve our bug. Thanks so much for the help! > > As for: > > > In addition are you really sure that no other thread that maybe still getting stored fields after all other threads have released the searcher? RefrenceManager only ensures no new threads can aquire a searcher, but nothing prevents other threads from using an open searcher that might have been released! > > The answer is no, I'm not sure. It is definitely possible we are doing something incorrect here, and I don't want to mislead the investigation. I will report back if I find solid evidence that there is an issue with `ReferenceManager` itself (and not our mis-use). You could configure MMapDir to disable grouping completely (see above with `dir.setGroupingFunction(MMapDirectory.NO_GROUPING)`). If you then test your code again in production, it should not hang on closing. Instead it might happen that searches running in parallel while you close throw `AlreadyClisedException`. But make sure to have high concurrency. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
