mccullocht commented on PR #14978:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14978#issuecomment-3119778015

   @ChrisHegarty started using bulk scoring for exhaustive search in 
66b9b6f006a301c51901e4ff7b41e6911435ac82. I had been thinking about whether or 
not we should do this based on density but that's a bit prescriptive and 
altering behavior based on the density of the ordinals is something that 
implementors may choose to deal with.
   
   I had run lucenebench comparing this branch to main and the results were 
neutral; I will rerun and include the results in the review thread.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to