jpountz commented on PR #14900: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14900#issuecomment-3084596936
> FWIW, I'm not really sure if sharing a thread pool b/w indexing and merging would be simpler than having separate thread pools and applying backpressure on indexing To me the reason for sharing the thread pools is not to make things simpler but rather to make it easier to control the overall number of active indexing+merging threads. For CPU-bound workloads (which indexing tends to be), the best approach is to create a thread pool sized based on the number of cores of the machine. You can't do this if indexing and merging don't use the same thread pool. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
