dsmiley commented on PR #14357: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14357#issuecomment-2730909459
BTW I don't have plans to explore this further. Anyone should feel free to take over. Or abandon if nobody cares -- I admit it's very unusual to even have a top level disjunction, let alone one with an expensive clause, as implied by the TPI. I found this while writing a simple test, so simple that it wasn't real-world representative. The real-world representative has the disjunction deeper than the top level, and that which doesn't show this performance problem as the bulk scorer is then not used. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
