atris commented on issue #14341: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14341#issuecomment-2715539509
@navneet1v Skimming through the issue, I think they refer to different problem statements. What you primarily want in the referenced GH issue is the ability to filter on more metadata during traversal vs doing a pre filter on the candidate documents themselves. As Adrien pointed out, this is better solved with more efficient filtering approaches (I wonder if the recent work on ACORN would help?) This issue is more towards the niche use cases where multiple graphs for a given segment would work. Multi threaded queries and disjoint cluster representation seem to be the immediate choices. @benwtrent I plan on publishing a draft approach for the disjoint clusters problem - maybe we can start with that and make the plumbing viable enough for general multi graph cases? @jpountz @msokolov would like to get your thoughts here, please -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
