sgup432 commented on issue #14222: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14222#issuecomment-2679321128
>But in a typical workload we expect to be spending most of our time executing queries rather than caching them, which will reduce the amount of time spent acquiring locks, and the contention, therefore the gains could become negligible It depends on the workload. Due to the query cache's caching policy, not all queries will be cached. However, with a workload that heavily utilizes the query cache, we can still expect overall benefits—though not as pronounced as the microbenchmark results above. These results suggest that the cache does not have to be a bottleneck itself. >Is it possible in the benchmarking framework to simulate a more realistic workload? Yes. I am trying that as well. Do you have any recommendations, such as any existing benchmarks I could use for this use case? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
