benwtrent commented on issue #14214: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14214#issuecomment-2674533124
> This means we have to sort at that point IIRC, but it might be a better, more robust choice? I am not sure if its "better" I would assume it makes search slower on well distributed and distinguished vectors :/ We should be able to automatically do the right thing as we know the distribution of the beam-width scores. Meaning, keeping well distinguished sparsity & handling silly (clustered/duplicate) data. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
