dweiss commented on issue #14090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14090#issuecomment-2568078503

   Yep, good observation. For me, it's not the forced cpu count but the 
tiered-stop-at-level that causes this to decrease:
   ```
   > java -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -Xmx1g -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 
-XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:ActiveProcessorCount=1 --version 2>&1 | grep 
"ReservedCodeCacheSize"
       uintx ReservedCodeCacheSize                    = 50331648                
               {pd product} {default}
   ```
   ```
   > java -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal  -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 --version 2>&1 | grep 
"ReservedCodeCacheSize"
       uintx ReservedCodeCacheSize                    = 50331648                
               {pd product} {default}
   > java -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal   --version 2>&1 | grep "ReservedCodeCacheSize"
       uintx ReservedCodeCacheSize                    = 251658240               
               {pd product} {ergonomic}
   ```
    
   I was fairly liberal with the setting... maybe I should correct it to, say 
~256mb instead of the 384?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to