jpountz commented on PR #14067:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14067#issuecomment-2545527000

   Indeed. We have a few such assertions already, e.g. to check that docs 
returned by the child query don't match the parent bitset. Adding a few more 
would be good if it can be done in a reasonable fashion (e.g. not forcing 
nextDoc() / advance() to be called just for the sake of validation).
   
   The block-join module also has `CheckJoinIndex`, which is expected to be 
used in a more offline fashion and will catch such bugs. 
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/a8d8d6b3d9efd483d29cb1aa8ff85672ad2be049/lucene/join/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/join/CheckJoinIndex.java#L63-L84


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to