jpountz commented on PR #13294: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13294#issuecomment-2049613669
> Maybe in the future (after this change) we could think about a more adaptive approach that'd spin up additional merge threads if the merge cost/time is highish (many vectors, few stored fields). I was wondering about the same. Maybe we could resurrect the auto-throttling mechanism, but at the CPU level rather than I/O. E.g. we could track the number of queued merges over some recent period of time, and dynamically increase the number of merge threads if there are queued merges consistently, or decrease it if the queue is always empty. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
