uschindler commented on code in PR #13229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13229#discussion_r1542132603


##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/IOContext.java:
##########
@@ -88,4 +84,18 @@ public IOContext(MergeInfo mergeInfo) {
     // Merges read input segments sequentially.
     this(Context.MERGE, mergeInfo, null, ReadAdvice.SEQUENTIAL);
   }
+
+  /**
+   * Return an updated {@link IOContext} that has the provided {@link 
ReadAdvice} if the {@link
+   * Context} is a {@link Context#READ} context, otherwise return this 
existing instance. This helps
+   * preserve a {@link ReadAdvice#SEQUENTIAL} advice for merging, which is 
always the right choice,
+   * while allowing {@link IndexInput}s open for searching to use arbitrary 
{@link ReadAdvice}s.
+   */
+  public IOContext toReadAdvice(ReadAdvice advice) {
+    if (context == Context.READ) {

Review Comment:
   I think "withReadAdvice" sounds better, because we do not convert to a 
readAdvice, but we create a new context with different readAdvice. Maybe native 
speakers can suggest a better name.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to