msokolov commented on PR #13153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13153#issuecomment-1997659513

   right that last change seemed promising! But on luceneutil tasks it didn't 
show much impact, basically a regression to teh mean compared to the first 
revision I tested; possibly a slight negative trend overall. I'll paste the 
results here. I was considering creating a more targeted benchmark to 
exaggerate the impact using a field and query type where we would expect to see 
a benefit, if only as a debugging tool, but I haven't had a chance to do that 
yet.  Another idea I had was to try to help branch prediction by using a 
specialized BlockDecoder or so rather than embedding if statements in every 
advance/nextDoc call. I'm also not sure whether writing full longs versus 
truncating the final long in the bitset and writing only as many bytes as 
needed (added in the recent revision) might be making some difference? Seems 
unlikely.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to