vsop-479 commented on issue #13022: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13022#issuecomment-1905672274
> Is findMerges() a bottleck for your use-case? No, though we find indexing performance downgrade when our index get too big, but the main reason may be `doStall` takes longer with data growing(we set maxMergeCount to 1 on HDD with ES's recommendation). I will enable `MergeScheduler.verbose` to verify that. I am just wondering if we can walk segments in increasing size order with some contract. > You can no longer easily do this if you walk segments in increasing size order. You are right, thanks for indicating it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
