mikemccand commented on PR #12899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12899#issuecomment-1848925405
> Are we sure that this did not affect already existing indexes, e.g. while
merging?
Great question @uschindler ("blast radius") -- I'm pretty sure newly 9.9.0
written indices are fine: it does look like `SegmentTermsEnum` is correct (the
bug is only in `IntersectTermsEnum`), but I'm still trying to convince myself
of this / figure out how to make a better test than our existing tiny-index BWC
tests...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
