shubhamvishu commented on code in PR #12799:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12799#discussion_r1395505763
##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/hnsw/HnswConcurrentMergeBuilder.java:
##########
@@ -77,42 +75,21 @@ public OnHeapHnswGraph build(int maxOrd) throws IOException
{
HNSW_COMPONENT,
"build graph from " + maxOrd + " vectors, with " + workers.length +
" workers");
}
- List<Future<?>> futures = new ArrayList<>();
+ List<Callable<Void>> futures = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < workers.length; i++) {
int finalI = i;
futures.add(
- exec.submit(
- () -> {
- try {
- workers[finalI].run(maxOrd);
- } catch (IOException e) {
- throw new RuntimeException(e);
- }
- }));
- }
- Throwable exc = null;
- for (Future<?> future : futures) {
- try {
- future.get();
- } catch (InterruptedException e) {
- var newException = new ThreadInterruptedException(e);
- if (exc == null) {
- exc = newException;
- } else {
- exc.addSuppressed(newException);
- }
- } catch (ExecutionException e) {
- if (exc == null) {
- exc = e.getCause();
- } else {
- exc.addSuppressed(e.getCause());
- }
- }
- }
- if (exc != null) {
- // The error handling was copied from TaskExecutor. should we just use
TaskExecutor instead?
- throw IOUtils.rethrowAlways(exc);
+ () -> {
+ try {
+ workers[finalI].run(maxOrd);
+ return null;
+ } catch (IOException e) {
Review Comment:
I don't think so. I retained this as it is. I'll remove it in the next
revision
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
