rmuir commented on code in PR #12747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12747#discussion_r1380016895


##########
lucene/benchmark-jmh/src/java/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/jmh/VectorUtilBenchmark.java:
##########
@@ -24,8 +24,14 @@
 @BenchmarkMode(Mode.Throughput)
 @OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MICROSECONDS)
 @State(Scope.Benchmark)
-@Warmup(iterations = 3, time = 3)
-@Measurement(iterations = 5, time = 3)
+// first iteration is complete garbage, so make sure we really warmup
+@Warmup(iterations = 4, time = 1)
+// real iterations. not useful to spend tons of time here, better to fork more
+@Measurement(iterations = 5, time = 1)
+// engage some noise reduction
+@Fork(

Review Comment:
   yes. so previously, you wouldn't see the "noise". it would just give wildly 
different answers across invocations. Now if it happens, we'll see it, and we 
can tweak the fork count per-method if needed to drown it out.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to