gsmiller commented on issue #11707:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11707#issuecomment-1450169614

   @Tjianke the [luceneutil](https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil) 
benchmarks are a great place to start. These power the [nightly 
benchmarks](https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/) that continuously 
run. For changes to such a core part of Lucene, the existing benchmark tasks 
will likely capture performance changes well (I would think). They're primarily 
focused on throughput/query-cost, but they can create separate indexes for your 
baseline/candidate code branches and you can manually diff the index sizes.
   
   For something like this, running microbenchmarks may also be useful. We did 
this the last time we made a change to the postings format. There's some 
history in #10889. I can try to jog my memory on that issue and answer 
questions if you have any :)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to