Tjianke commented on issue #11707:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11707#issuecomment-1449598942

   Lucene community has the good tradition of incorporating academic results. 
Recent studies show many efficient algorithms like [Partitioned 
Elias-Fano](http://groups.di.unipi.it/~ottavian/files/elias_fano_sigir14.pdf). 
Here's a great [paper ](https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10598)comparing the 
space-time trade-off of various index compression. I'm interested in evaluating 
current codec and implementing state-of-art compressions if viable. But I'm new 
to Lucene, which aspects (index size/query speed/memory/CPU) do we need to 
evaluate? Is there any mature benchmark to exploit, I noticed a LuceneBenchmark 
repo though.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to