zacharymorn commented on issue #11428: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11428#issuecomment-1409624566
Thanks @dnhatn for the pointers! I took some further look but still couldn't seems to find a comparison discussion between doc value approach vs. encoding it into liv doc initially? @s1monw @rmuir not sure if you may recall any for the following question? > Was there any historical context / reason of not encoding soft delete into liv doc in the first place? From https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8233, it looks like the API design were proposed and accepted to give users some flexibility? --- > Soft-deletes can index already-soft-deleted documents. We need to make sure to support this feature when switching to LiveDocsFormat. > I don't think we should deprecate it until we figure out how to index already-soft-deleted documents. Sorry I had forgotten to ask about this earlier. By "index already-soft-deleted documents", are you referring to the "undelete" feature as mentioned in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8198 ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
