rmuir commented on code in PR #12054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12054#discussion_r1068156278


##########
lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/IndexFiles.java:
##########
@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ void indexDoc(IndexWriter writer, Path file, long 
lastModified) throws IOExcepti
       // field that is indexed (i.e. searchable), but don't tokenize
       // the field into separate words and don't index term frequency
       // or positional information:
-      Field pathField = new StringField("path", file.toString(), 
Field.Store.YES);
-      doc.add(pathField);
+      doc.add(new KeywordField("path", file.toString()));
+      doc.add(new StoredField("path", file.toString()));

Review Comment:
   and obviously, fixing this can be a followup to this PR. but we should do it 
before releasing the new APIs. These new fields are supposed to be easy to use, 
so they should support storing as well.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to