rendel commented on issue #11702: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11702#issuecomment-1309968917
> I don't think ESQL is going to be different from existing faceting support: it will still want to use ordinals when it makes sense such as grouping by term. @jpountz This may be correct for aggregate operation, however, if you wish to support join operation in ESQL at some point, then you'll need to perform a scan of the binary values and not of the ordinal values (as they are not compatible with a join operation). > Would you be willing to contribute your multi-valued binary doc value implementation here? I think having multi-value parity with other doc value types is good to support multiple use cases like this. @nknize We do not see any problem in sharing the code, but our implementation is based on the Elasticsearch framework (on the `BinaryFieldMapper.CustomBinaryDocValuesField` to be exact), not Lucene, so likely it will be not relevant for this thread. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
