javanna commented on PR #11793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11793#issuecomment-1289134578

   @jpountz I addressed the check index issue, and pushed an update around the 
packed values that are null in the empty point values instance. That scenario 
is a bit tricky and ghost fields are not extensively tested, I wonder if more 
testing is a thing we'd like to do. I am not entirely sure if things may go 
wrong when the packed values are retrieved with `PointTree`. That should be the 
`intersect` path and I could not yet determine if there may be NPEs there too 
with ghost fields. I am though under impression that we assumed before that 
`PointValues` is not null, hence in the worst case we would still have an NPE 
but in a different place.
   
   What do you think?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to