reta commented on issue #11788:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11788#issuecomment-1254977405

   @rmuir @uschindler thanks guys
   
   > looks like an antlr problem, if they broke backwards compat, they prolly 
should have named it 5.x?
   
   Sadly I don't know the story, I believe it was merged / reverted / and than 
brought up again.
   
   > let's be careful about upgrading to new versions. newer antlr versions 
have historically been trappy, e.g. happily doing extremely slow things instead 
of simply failing at "compile time" if there are problems in the grammar.
   
   I see the risks now, may be we could explore the route to convert 
problematic serialized blobs from v3 to v4?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to