jmazanec15 commented on PR #1068: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1068#issuecomment-1241094561
> The fact that it should be legal for ConjunctionDISI to return NO_MORE_DOCS when the lead iterator advances to NO_MORE_DOCS without advancing other iterators makes me wonder if this change is hiding another bug. Is it valid for an iterator to advance outside of the ConjunctionDISI? I cant find anywhere that prevents this, but I was under the assumption it should be invalid to do this. > Do you understand why it's important for clauses under the ConjuctionDISI to advance to NO_MORE_DOCS? In general I was trying to keep all sub-iterators on the same doc all the time. In terms of importance, I guess it depends if the iterators can be used outside the ConjunctionDISI. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
