[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17561754#comment-17561754
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10635:
---------------------------------------
Thinking out loud, maybe one way to do this would be to have a specialized
WANDQuery in the test folder that is guaranteed to produce a WANDScorer?
> Ensure test coverage for WANDScorer after additional scorers get added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10635
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10635
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Zach Chen
> Priority: Major
>
> This is a follow-up issue from discussions
> [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#issuecomment-1170684358] &
> [https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/972#pullrequestreview-1024377641] .
>
> As additional scorers such as BlockMaxMaxscoreScorer get added, some tests in
> TestWANDScorer that used to test WANDScorer now test BlockMaxMaxscoreScorer
> instead, reducing test coverage for WANDScorer. We would like to see how we
> can ensure TestWANDScorer reliably tests WANDScorer, perhaps by initiating
> the scorer directly inside the tests?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
