[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17552279#comment-17552279
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10602:
---------------------------------------
We sure can build something custom in Elasticsearch, I was thinking that
evicting unused entries would be generally useful to all Lucene users, who are
encouraged to used LRUQueryCache since it's currently the only implementation
of the QueryCache interface.
> Dynamic Index Cache Sizing
> --------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10602
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10602
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Chris Earle
> Priority: Major
>
> Working with Lucene's filter cache, it has become apparent that it can be an
> enormous drain on the heap and therefore the JVM. After extensive usage of an
> index, it is not uncommon to tune performance by shrinking or altogether
> removing the filter cache.
> Lucene tracks hit/miss stats of the filter cache, but it does nothing with
> the data other than inform an interested user about the effectiveness of
> their index's caching.
> It would be interesting if Lucene would be able to tune the index filter
> cache heuristically based on actual usage (age, frequency, and value).
> This could ultimately be used to give GBs of heap back to an individual
> Lucene instance instead of burning it on cache storage that's not effectively
> used (or useful).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
