[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17538867#comment-17538867
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10578:
----------------------------------------
Thanks [~rcmuir] for your comments, and especially for the runtime version spec
- this was my major concern here. We can safely depend on the minor and
security versions (I assume the vendors comply with the spec... I'll check some
distributions), then I think we'll be able to have it in the next release; it'd
be more important in the maintenance/release branches.
> Make minimum required Java version for build more specific
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10578
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10578
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
> Priority: Minor
>
> See this mail thread for background:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread/6md5k94pqdkkwg0f66hor2sonm2t77jo]
> To prevent developers (especially, release managers) from using too old java
> versions, we could (should?) elaborate the minimum required java versions for
> the build.
> Possible questions in my mind:
> * should we stop the build with an error or emit a warning and continue?
> * do minor versions depend on the vendor? if yes, should we also specify the
> vendor?
> * how do we determine/maintain the minimum version?
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
