[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17536778#comment-17536778
]
Rushabh Shah commented on LUCENE-10392:
---------------------------------------
[~jpountz] I am new to Lucene project. This will be 2nd issue. Given that this
is a minor task, I would like to create a PR for this. Can you please elaborate
the steps needed to tackle this issue ? Also if you can point me to some
classes relevant to this patch where I can read more about the existing
behavior, that would be helpful. Thank you.
> Handle soft deletes via LiveDocsFormat
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10392
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10392
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
>
> We have been using doc values to handle soft deletes until now, but this is a
> bit of a hack as it:
> - forces users to reserve a field name for doc values
> - generally doesn't read directly from doc values, instead docs values help
> populate bitsets and then reads are performed via these bitsets
> It would also be more natural to have both hard and soft deletes handled by
> the same file format?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
