uschindler commented on code in PR #633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/633#discussion_r862504146
##########
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/index/MockRandomMergePolicy.java:
##########
@@ -86,6 +86,20 @@ public MergeSpecification findMerges(
return mergeSpec;
}
+ @Override
+ public MergeSpecification findMerges(CodecReader... readers) throws
IOException {
+ if (random.nextBoolean() == true) {
+ return super.findMerges(readers);
+ } else {
+ // create a oneMerge for each reader to let them get concurrently
processed by addIndexes()
Review Comment:
I don't think those tests are wrong. The tests are there to test specific
merging behaviour. If they only expect one segment they should only get one
segment. Those tests should not suddenly get a concurrent addIndexes behaviour.
That's not what they assert. So there is definitely nothing wrong with those
tests. Changes in them should be reverted!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
