uschindler commented on PR #816: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/816#issuecomment-1110698870
> That being said, I don't have real opposition to this patch, but I want us to be careful about correctness. I am also concerned about not hurting the performance of well-behaved apps that don't do bad things. I'm not the best one to review the concurrency/performance implications, as I only have a small 2-core laptop and I can barely remember how Java language works. But let's not punish apps that use threads reasonably. I'm not concerned about performance of badly behaved apps, because they need to fix how they use threads, and we can't help them do that. See my previous comment: I fully agree and I doubt that this will not affect performance for well-behaving apps. With that patch every `get()` goes through a lock, because the underlying map has no concurrent variant (missing `WeakConcurrentHashMap`) in Java. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
