mocobeta opened a new pull request, #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/793
`JapaneseTokenizer.Position` and `KoreanTokenizer.Position` are almost the same except for `backWordPos` array, which only exists in KoreanTokenizer. To factor out the viterbi algorighm, the two `Position` classes have to be made identical, at least for the moment. I'm sorry that this adds the extra int array to KuromojTokenizer, but I think the integration is worth much that and optimization can come later. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
