[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17486213#comment-17486213
]
Nhat Nguyen commented on LUCENE-10392:
--------------------------------------
+1. That'd be great. We can avoid writing docValues in refresh with soft
deletes.
> Handle soft deletes via LiveDocsFormat
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10392
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10392
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
>
> We have been using doc values to handle soft deletes until now, but this is a
> bit of a hack as it:
> - forces users to reserve a field name for doc values
> - generally doesn't read directly from doc values, instead docs values help
> populate bitsets and then reads are performed via these bitsets
> It would also be more natural to have both hard and soft deletes handled by
> the same file format?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
