mayya-sharipova commented on pull request #416:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/416#issuecomment-997145470


   @jtibshirani Thanks for continuing your review.
   
   My main questions to @jpountz and @msokolov is indeed about file formats.
   
   Is it better to keep the current design of 3 files: .vem (metadata), .vec 
(vectors), and .vex (graphs neighbours), and extra information about graph 
levels into the metadata file? This make metadata file even bigger, but will 
allow to load all info for `FieldEntry` from a single meta file.
   
   Or is it better to break the current `metadata` file into 2 files 1) .vem - 
a smaller field description file and 2) a bigger .vel file about graph levels 
and neighbours' offsets?  This make metadata file small, but `FieldEntry` is 
loaded from two files.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to