jpountz commented on pull request #418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/418#issuecomment-985639015


   These numbers are super interesting. Let's go with the approach of you 
baseline for now since it performs better, sorry for putting you on a track 
that performs worse. :)
   
   Regarding the new utility class, I was hoping that it could be a 
higher-level abstraction, eg. a `SynonymImpactsSource`, rather than low-level 
utility methods?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to