gautamworah96 commented on a change in pull request #179: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/179#discussion_r696495553
########## File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/directory/DirectoryTaxonomyReader.java ########## @@ -351,12 +348,140 @@ public FacetLabel getPath(int ordinal) throws IOException { } synchronized (categoryCache) { - categoryCache.put(catIDInteger, ret); + categoryCache.put(ordinal, ret); } return ret; } + private FacetLabel getPathFromCache(int ordinal) { + // TODO: can we use an int-based hash impl, such as IntToObjectMap, + // wrapped as LRU? + synchronized (categoryCache) { + return categoryCache.get(ordinal); + } + } + + private void checkOrdinalBounds(int ordinal) throws IllegalArgumentException { + if (ordinal < 0 || ordinal >= indexReader.maxDoc()) { + throw new IllegalArgumentException( + "ordinal " + + ordinal + + " is out of the range of the indexReader " + + indexReader.toString() + + ". The maximum possible ordinal number is " + + (indexReader.maxDoc() - 1)); + } + } + + /** + * Returns an array of FacetLabels for a given array of ordinals. + * + * <p>This API is generally faster than iteratively calling {@link #getPath(int)} over an array of + * ordinals. It uses the {@link #getPath(int)} method iteratively when it detects that the index + * was created using StoredFields (with no performance gains) and uses DocValues based iteration + * when the index is based on BinaryDocValues. Lucene switched to BinaryDocValues in version 9.0 + * + * @param ordinals Array of ordinals that are assigned to categories inserted into the taxonomy + * index + */ + public FacetLabel[] getBulkPath(int... ordinals) throws IOException { + ensureOpen(); + + int ordinalsLength = ordinals.length; + FacetLabel[] bulkPath = new FacetLabel[ordinalsLength]; + // remember the original positions of ordinals before they are sorted + int[] originalPosition = new int[ordinalsLength]; + Arrays.setAll(originalPosition, IntUnaryOperator.identity()); + + for (int i = 0; i < ordinalsLength; i++) { + // check whether the ordinal is valid before accessing the cache + checkOrdinalBounds(ordinals[i]); + // check the cache before trying to find it in the index + FacetLabel ordinalPath = getPathFromCache(ordinals[i]); Review comment: Yes. This should obviously be better. Fixed in the next commit -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org