[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17390076#comment-17390076
 ] 

Feng Gui commented on LUCENE-10041:
-----------------------------------

https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/231

> Duplication computation for TieredMergePolicy's numDeletesToMerge
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10041
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10041
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/index
>    Affects Versions: 8.4
>            Reporter: Feng Gui
>            Assignee: Nhat Nguyen
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: IMG21.jpeg
>
>
> In lucene 8.4 (Elasticsearch 7.6.2), all indices are soft-deletes enabled. We 
> found the *TieredMergePolicy* contains redundant query computation to acquire 
> numDeletesToMerge for findMerges. According to code from 
> [getSortedBySegmentSize|https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/TieredMergePolicy.java#L303]
>  , we should reuse the result of numDeletesToMerge which can reduce 3% CPU 
> and some IO overheads.
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to