gsmiller commented on pull request #227: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/227#issuecomment-888465657
This is really interesting/exciting! I'm working through this PR now but I notice you've used a slightly different approach to the FOR encoding (compared to what's done in the postings). Is this intentional for some reason, or is it more to get something out quickly for benchmarking (results were interesting by the way!)? Is there a reason you chose not to use the existing `ForUtil` directly? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
