gautamworah96 commented on a change in pull request #220:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/220#discussion_r677669790
##########
File path:
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/directory/DirectoryTaxonomyWriter.java
##########
@@ -475,8 +477,15 @@ private int addCategoryDocument(FacetLabel categoryPath,
int parent) throws IOEx
String fieldPath = FacetsConfig.pathToString(categoryPath.components,
categoryPath.length);
fullPathField.setStringValue(fieldPath);
+
+ if (useOlderStoredFieldIndex) {
+ fullPathField = new StringField(Consts.FULL, fieldPath, Field.Store.YES);
Review comment:
So when we first initialize the `fieldPath` variable it is
[initialized](https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/d5d6dc079395c47cd6d12dcce3bcfdd2c7d9dc63/lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/directory/DirectoryTaxonomyWriter.java#L185)
with `Field.Store.NO`. Then when we realize that the field has to be stored as
a StringField, we need its value as well, so I reassign it with a `new
StringField(Consts.FULL, fieldPath, Field.Store.YES)` statement.
> Maybe just move the above line inside the if?
Sure
> why don't we also re-use the BinaryDocValues field
Hmmm. Could you elaborate a bit? The field depends on the input `FacetLabel
categoryPath`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
