gsmiller commented on pull request #2521: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2521#issuecomment-883666505
I'm a bit skeptical of needing to backport both of these changes together to be honest. For LUCENE-9948, I think the easiest/best thing to do is to let it be a breaking change with 9.0 and not worry too much about trying to introduce it earlier. @gautamworah96 my recollection is that the change in LUCENE-9964 was fairly straight-forward, and it seems to me like it could be backported on its own without needing to tangle in changes from LUCENE-9948. Is that not the case? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
