[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17383126#comment-17383126
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9959:
-------------------------------------
I don't think we should do this anymore. Somehow this has morphed into a
david-smiley-adds-shit-tons-of-new-public-classes-for-no-goddamn-reason without
actually solving any problems. We shouldn't even tackle this issue if it can't
be done in a responsible way without destroying APIs.
> Can we remove threadlocals of stored fields and term vectors
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9959
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 7.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> [~rmuir] suggested removing these threadlocals at
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/137#issuecomment-840111367.
> These threadlocals are trappy if you manage many segments and threads within
> the same JVM, or worse: non-fixed threadpools. The challenge is to keep the
> API easy to use.
> We could take advantage of 9.0 to change the stored fields API?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
