[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Miller updated LUCENE-9971:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Inconsistent SSDVFF and Taxonomy facet behavior in case of unseen dimension
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9971
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Alexander L
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: main (9.0)
>
> Time Spent: 2h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Unlike other org.apache.lucene.facet.Facet interface implementations,
> SortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts and ConcurrentSortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts
> [throw an exception in case of unseen dimension in the getTopChildren()
> method
> |https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/sortedset/SortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts.java#L99]
>
> It is inconsistent with [Facet interface
> documentation|https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/Facets.java#L33]
> and not pleasant to deal with: in our case requested dimensions can be
> manually specified by the user, so we should always catch that and check the
> exception message to be sure of the exact cause.
> During the PR review, it was also decided to make similar changes for
> Taxonomy implementation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
